easyDisputes

Hansel Henson is a leading London Intellectual Property and Media law firm of solicitors.

We are expert in dealing with branding, copyright, trade mark and domain name disputes. Our clients are varied, ranging from major global brands to fast growing start-up businesses.

We have considerable experience in dealing with cases involving easyGroup IP Licensing Limited and other companies founded by Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou.

No easy monopoly!

Following the great success of easyJet, Sir Stelios sought to extend his easy brand to other businesses. His own businesses, such as easyEverything, easyDorm, easyCruise and easyCinema, are long forgotten flops.  Nothing anywhere near matched the success of easyJet.  In more recent years Sir Stelios has switched to a "royalty business model", where having identified a successful business already trading under a name beginning with easy, he will engage with them through his lawyers.  Thus, companies such as Easy Networks, King & McGaw (the former Easyart) and Easy Cleaning have been sued in the High Court before agreeing to assign their IP rights to easyGroup and license back the name to trade under the distinctive easyJet orange get-up. It is a novel, if expensive, way of pursuing a passion to own the word "easy".

The truth is that nobody has - nor ever can - have a monopoly in the plain word “easy” in relation to all types of goods and services. The form on the UK IPO's website for registering a new trade mark even gives an example company name of "Easy Ironing Limited" - and you would be hard pressed to disagree with the UK's trade mark registry! We think that Sir Stelios's efforts to get a monopoly are bound to fail. There is also the suspicion that he is not implementing his royalty business model in a particularly easy way (doing business with someone who has sued you does not seem appealing).  However, until he retires, he remains a danger to anyone who trades with "easy" (or "easi", "easy", "ezee" or any other similar word) at the start of their name.

More than fifteen years ago our senior partner David Hansel, a recognised trade mark law expert, acted for Easyart in its successful defence of High Court proceedings brought by easyGroup. He has more recently helped EasyPizza, Easyart and Easynet defend themselves when sued by easyGroup. That is just a small selection - David has been instructed by around 30 other "easy" companies over the last 15 years  - see for instance, story here.

easyGroup was unsuccessful in a January 2018 High Court judgment on a case involving a trade mark infringement and passing off claim brought by easyGroup against W3 Limited, and its owner Mr Pons, for the use of their ‘easyroommate’ signs. It was decided that the use of ‘easyroomate’ did not infringe easyGroup’s EU trade mark rights and W3 Limited and Mr Pons had not committed any acts of passing off. Whilst easyGroup appealed, the parties settled and the appeal was withdrawn shortly before the case was due to be heard by the Court of Appeal. The judgment stands and provides us with key points of law relevant to trade mark law and infringement. 

Thinking of using the word easy?

If you are thinking of using the word “easy” in relation to a business or product name, then you should think twice. Firstly, easyGroup may well write to you threatening trade mark infringement! Secondly, easyJet is well known and distinctive, and no business should seek to mimic the distinctive easyGroup get-up of orange and white, lower case ‘e’ and capitalised ‘J’ and Cooper Black font. Thirdly, because the name is so descriptive and very commonly used, you may find it will take a long time for it to become distinctive - consider opting for something less commonplace and descriptive.

Sir Stelios has invested huge sums in his easyGroup project. If you really must use ‘easy’, but want to reduce the chances of problems with easyGroup, avoid the elements included in their brand manual.

Trade mark law is complicated, and we are not going to explain it all here. However, the UK IPO has some excellent resources on its website. As with any branding advice, you are best advised to see a good solicitor or trade mark attorney.

Received a letter?

You may be one of the hundreds of businesses who have received a letter alleging trade mark infringement and passing off from one of the firms of solicitors representing easyGroup and/ or easyJet. EasyGroup has used a large number of solicitors firms over the years and the current firms enforcing include Edwin Coe, Eversheds Sutherland, Stephenson Harwood and Addleshaw Goddard.

If you receive such a letter from easyGroup's solicitors accusing you of trade mark infringement and passing off

We may be able to advise you, although we will need to run a conflict check and to charge you for our advice. We also accept instructions from other law firms who wish to maintain the relationship with their client but wish to have our expert advice.

Whilst nobody can have a total trade mark monopoly on the word easy, EasyJet and easyGroup do have rights that they are entitled to defend. There are certainly circumstances where they are entitled to stop those who misappropriate their valuable goodwill and confuse the public. If you are looking to rip off easyJet or easyGroup branding, then please do not contact us. Instead read the easyRealestate case and think again!

For commentary and insights relating to the January 2018 High Court judgment involving W3 Limited and easyGroup, please see this article

If you are thinking of engaging us then please contact David Hansel